Rudi posed me this question when we were on the bus ride back home. He always comes up with these type of though intriguing questions whenever he starts talking serious and it always sets me thinking about my future. Basically, it was all about how Singaporean female university graduates would prefer not to marry someone who had a lower level of education than her and how we girls are at a disadvantage at the end of the day. Why? Because if you look at the ratio of the girls to guys in university, the number of females far outweigh the number of males. In Bizad itself the ratio is 1.8 (girls) : 1 (guys). In Pharmacy, I hear the ratio is 7:1. And according to Rudi's explanation, if there wasn't a cap put on the ratio of female:male medicine students, the female population might more than trounce the number of males studying medicine. He quotes from RJ stats where out of the 13 medicine classes, all have the female population outweighing the male population. Ahh... Forgot to ask about the Engineers. I'm pretty sure the ratio in there would be highly reversed (maybe something like 1 girls : 3 guys?)
At the end of the day, his point was that there are more female graduates than male graduates.(hmm... but if we count in the engineers, will that still stand?) That being stated, he was saying that females will definitely be at the losing end, because female graduates would only have such a small pool of male graduates to choose from. And why such a small pool? Especially in a Singaporean context, thinking is still very traditional and in terms of relationship issues, it's still skewed highly to a masculine thought: The male has to have higher or equivalent level of education to his female counterpart and not lower; The male will still be the breadwinner of the family even though his partner maybe earning a respectable income because, eventually the males will have to shoulder that responsibility. Sure, this trend may be changing, but it will take a very long time for females to accept a male who has a lower level of education than her. And, he proves it by saying that there are many females who are choosing to remain single than marry someone of lower education level (which, is a huge society problem). Cos, these women are financially independent, so they are not eager for a financial pillar to lean on and slacken off unless they find one steady and sturdy one who has as vast a financial independence and intellectual level as them. And, so goes his theory that SDU and SDS will never merge because of this disparity. On the otherhand of males, if all else fails, and they really want to get married, there are always China, Vietnamese brides for them to take their pick. So, should they really be unlucky with Singaporean women, they can always shop for a bride for another Asian country.
On hearing his case, I gave him the "are you sure" look. And he shot me this question: Would you marry someone who was not a university graduate? Would you marry someone who is not earning a pay packet around yours?" That really stumped me for a while, because, deep down inside, I knew that he was right. Maybe not so much for his second question, but for me, as long my future husband is able to provide for the family (without having to eat into my pay), I'm fine with it. My pay packet will go to my own expenses and other investments, like house etc. I mean, he's the man, so he should be able to provide for the whole family. But, for the first question, I had to agree with him. I would not marry someone who was not a university graduate. Well, at least at this stage of life, I would not marry someone who isn't a university graduate (I don't want to make things hard, but if I had it my way, not some university degree, but one from a university which has had some reputation at least). Yes, I may sound very superficial, but I think many girls would love to have someone who is intellectually on par or even better than them. It makes you think more and you have more intelligent conversations rather than just superficial talk. Just like the way Rudi always makes me think whenever I talk to him (sure, he has his crazy moments), but when he gets serious and poses me questions, I find it super challenging and that challenge makes the conversation highly interesting. Rudi's an extreme example, cos he's got the smarts. But, if I had that type of conversations with my future spouse once it a while, would be great. Apart from the intellect, I think it gives us girls a form of assurance and the knowledge that the person has a higher probability of being financially stable. Call us bimbos for being such superficial beings, but that type of assurance is one important thing to allow us to spend the rest of our lives with that person. In financial terms, it's the choice of investing in (i) a stock that has the higher probability of higher returns and lower risk, or (ii) a stock which has higher probability of lower returns and higher risk, or if all stocks don't look good, or (iii) might as well not invest. For me, (i) and (iii) will be the way to go. (I think I've been having too much of FM class).
Ahh well, but I never know what God has installed for me. (I don't deny that I'm secretly praying that my future husband will have those ideals) So, for now, don't blame me if I say I wanna marry a doctor/ banker (Investment, corporate banker would be good)/ someone working at management level in an MNC/ lawyer/ Dentist etc etc...